Federal Crimes Defense
The lawyer you need to fight your case and win you the best possible outcome
Omaha's Federal Crimes defense attorney
Federal criminal defense is a complex and nuanced area of law that requires the expertise of an attorney who practices federal criminal law. Federal criminal law is different from state criminal law in that it deals with offenses that are committed against the United States government. These crimes are investigated and prosecuted by federal agencies such as the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Some of the most common federal crimes include:
Drug trafficking: Federal law makes it illegal to manufacture, distribute, or possess drugs with the intent to distribute them. This crime can result in severe penalties, including lengthy prison sentences and hefty fines.
White-collar crimes: These are non-violent offenses committed by individuals or businesses for financial gain. Examples include fraud, embezzlement, and money laundering.
Firearms offenses: Federal law regulates the sale, possession, and use of firearms. Violations of these laws can result in serious consequences.
Immigration offenses: Federal law governs immigration, and violations can lead to deportation, fines, and imprisonment.
Cybercrimes: With the rise of technology, the government has become more vigilant in pursuing those who engage in cybercrimes such as hacking, identity theft, and internet fraud.
When facing federal criminal charges, it is crucial to have a skilled and diligent criminal defense attorney on your side. These attorneys will analyze the evidence against you, scrutinize the government’s case, and identify any weaknesses or inconsistencies. They will also advise you on your legal options and negotiate with prosecutors to obtain the best possible outcome.
In federal criminal cases, the defense attorney’s goal is to obtain a verdict of not guilty or have the charges against the defendant reduced or dismissed. To do so, they may employ several defense strategies, including:
Challenging the evidence: The prosecution must prove the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The defense attorney may challenge the admissibility of evidence or argue that the government’s evidence is insufficient to prove the defendant’s guilt.
Asserting a constitutional violation: The defense attorney may argue that the government violated the defendant’s constitutional rights during the investigation or arrest.
Negotiating a plea bargain: If the evidence against the defendant is overwhelming, the defense attorney may negotiate a plea bargain with the prosecution to obtain a reduced sentence or lesser charges.
I’ve worked closely with Tim for several years, and he cares deeply about his clients and goes above & beyond for them.
